Home About Us Services ↳ Canada PR Visa (Permanent Residency) ↳ Work Permit Canada ↳ LMIA — Labour Market Impact Assessment ↳ Spouse & Family Sponsorship Visa ↳ Student Visa Canada ↳ Visitor Visa ↳ Business Visa Provinces ↳ 🏙️ Ontario ↳ 🏔️ British Columbia ↳ 🌾 Alberta ↳ 🌻 Saskatchewan ↳ 🌊 Manitoba ↳ ⚓ Nova Scotia ↳ 🍁 New Brunswick ↳ 🦞 Prince Edward Island ↳ 🐟 Newfoundland & Labrador ↳ 🌊 Atlantic Immigration Program Healthcare Blog FAQ Careers Canada Contact

Archived - Decision: 95-004 CANADA LABOUR CODE PART II OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH

Archived information

Archived information is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

Review under section 146 of the Canada Labour Code, Part II

of a direction issued by a safety officer

Decision No.:95-004

Applicant: Air Canada
Montreal International Airport, Mirabel
Represented by: Counsel Louise Hélène Sénécal

Interested party: International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers
District Lodge 148, IAMAW
Represented by: G. Brosseau
General Chairman

Mis en Cause: Denis Caron
Safety Officer
Human Resources Development Canada

Before: Serge Cadieux
Regional Safety Officer
Human Resources Development Canada


On February 4, 1995 a direction was given, under paragraph 145(2)(a) of the Canada Labour Code, Part II to Air Canada by safety officer Denis Caron. This direction was given following an accident which resulted in the death of three employees working at deicing airplanes at the Montreal International Airport, located in Mirabel. Air Canada requested, in a timely fashion, a review of the direction.

Following discussions held between the safety officer, union representatives and safety and health coordinators of the IAMAW regarding safe deicing procedures, Air Canada withdrew its request for review of the direction. Ms. Sénécal has advised the Regional Safety Officer that she fully understood the consequence of desisting herself from the appeal i.e. that the safety officer's direction remains in force.

As the Regional Safety Officer responsible to review this direction, I am confirming that Air Canada has withdrawn its request to have the direction, issued on February 4, 1995 by safety officer Denis Caron, reviewed. I therefore declare that I am no longer seized of this matter. This file is closed.

Decision rendered on March 2nd, 1995.

Serge Cadieux
Regional Safety Officer

SUMMARY OF REGIONAL SAFETY OFFICER DECISION


Decision No.: 95-004

Applicant: Air Canada, Montreal International Airport (Mirabel)

Respondent: International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers

KEYWORDS:

Air Canada; deicing; fatal accident

PROVISIONS:

Canada Labour Code, Part II, Paragraph 145(2)(a)

SUMMARY:

On February 4, 1995, Air Canada was issued a direction by a safety officer as a result of fatal accidents which occurred during deicing of an aircraft. Air Canada requested a review of the direction but almost immediately withdrew its request following an agreement it reached with employee representatives and with the safety officer respecting safe deicing procedures.

Page details

2017-02-10

Quick Enquiry

We usually reply within a few hours
By submitting you agree to be contacted about your enquiry.
Call us Chat on WhatsApp
M

Migova AI Assistant

Online now
Hi 👋 I'm the Migova AI assistant, powered by OpenAI. Ask me about PR, study visas, work permits, LMIA, family sponsorship, provinces, or healthcare immigration to Canada.
Canada PR
Study Visa
LMIA / Work Permit