Home About Us Services ↳ Canada PR Visa (Permanent Residency) ↳ Work Permit Canada ↳ LMIA — Labour Market Impact Assessment ↳ Spouse & Family Sponsorship Visa ↳ Student Visa Canada ↳ Visitor Visa ↳ Business Visa Provinces ↳ 🏙️ Ontario ↳ 🏔️ British Columbia ↳ 🌾 Alberta ↳ 🌻 Saskatchewan ↳ 🌊 Manitoba ↳ ⚓ Nova Scotia ↳ 🍁 New Brunswick ↳ 🦞 Prince Edward Island ↳ 🐟 Newfoundland & Labrador ↳ 🌊 Atlantic Immigration Program Healthcare Blog FAQ Careers Canadian Latest policies Contact

# 2025-115 Careers, Judge Arbour Rec. 10 – sexual-related files, Performance Appraisal Report

Judge Arbour Rec. 10 – sexual-related files, Performance Appraisal Report (PAR)

Case summary

F&R Date: 2026-03-06

The grievor challenged the assessment of her potential contained in section 5 of her 2023–2024 Performance Appraisal Report (PAR). She argued that this assessment did not reflect the positive feedback she had received during the reporting period. She further submitted that her 2022–2023 and 2023–2024 PARs failed to take into account a traumatic incident of which she had been the victim and that had significant repercussions on her psychological well-being throughout both reporting periods. As redress, the grievor requested a transfer of responsibility with respect to her 2023–2024 PAR so that it could be reassessed.

The Initial Authority (IA), the Chief, Professional Conduct and Culture, concluded that the grievor had not been aggrieved, as her PAR had been prepared by the unit that employed her for the majority of the evaluation period and her 2022–2023 and 2023–2024 PARs demonstrated positive professional progression. Accordingly, the IA concluded that a reassessment of the 2023–2024 PAR was not warranted.

After reviewing the grievor's PAR and obtaining additional information from the commanding officer of the unit responsible for the PAR, the Committee found no evidence that the grievor's 2023–2024 assessment had been drafted with consideration for her medical condition or the principles governing the treatment of victims of wrongdoing, as set out in Defence Administrative Orders and Directives 9005-1, Sexual Misconduct Response. The Committee concluded that the support measures provided to the grievor during this period were insufficient and inadequate. Consequently, the Committee found that the 2023–2024 PAR could not be considered reasonable or fair, as essential factors relating to her medical condition, mitigating circumstances, and the employer's duty to accommodate had clearly not been taken into account. The Committee recommended that the Final Authority direct a competent and independent authority to conduct a reassessment of the grievor's 2023–2024 PAR, taking into consideration all factors relevant to her circumstances.

Page details

2026-08-17

Quick Enquiry

We usually reply within a few hours
By submitting you agree to be contacted about your enquiry.
Call us Chat on WhatsApp
M

Migova AI Assistant

Online now
Hi 👋 I'm the Migova AI assistant, powered by OpenAI. Ask me about PR, study visas, work permits, LMIA, family sponsorship, provinces, or healthcare immigration to Canada.
Canada PR
Study Visa
LMIA / Work Permit