Home About Us Services ↳ Canada PR Visa (Permanent Residency) ↳ Work Permit Canada ↳ LMIA — Labour Market Impact Assessment ↳ Spouse & Family Sponsorship Visa ↳ Student Visa Canada ↳ Visitor Visa ↳ Business Visa Provinces ↳ 🏙️ Ontario ↳ 🏔️ British Columbia ↳ 🌾 Alberta ↳ 🌻 Saskatchewan ↳ 🌊 Manitoba ↳ ⚓ Nova Scotia ↳ 🍁 New Brunswick ↳ 🦞 Prince Edward Island ↳ 🐟 Newfoundland & Labrador ↳ 🌊 Atlantic Immigration Program Healthcare Blog FAQ Careers Canada Contact

# 2024-048 Careers, Release, Release – Reserve, Release - Voluntary

Release, Release – Reserve, Release - Voluntary

Case summary

F&R Date: 2025-09-02

The grievor disputed his delayed voluntary release from the Canadian Armed Forces, contending that he was legally entitled to release upon completion of his period of Class “B” Reserve Service. The grievor claimed that delaying his release was punitive and had detrimental effects on his pension and prevented his access to Veterans Affairs Canada services. As redress, the grievor requested his release be backdated to the day before his 50th birthday and that he be granted pay and recognition of the days of Class “A” Reserve Service he worked on his grievance. 

As the Initial Authority did not render a decision within the required timeline, the grievor requested that his grievance be forwarded to the Final Authority (FA) as per article 7.15 of the Queen's Regulations and Orders for the Canadian Forces. 

The Committee first noted that the implications on the grievor's pension would have occurred regardless of a delay in his release, as such were deemed irrelevant to the grieved matter. The Committee found that as the grievor had not yet been lawfully released and had not yet reached Compulsory Retirement Age, he did not have a right to release upon completion of his period of Class “B” Reserve Service. The Committee further found that it was reasonable for the grievor's Commanding Officer to delay his release given an ongoing investigation of alleged misconduct, pursuant to Defence Administrative Orders and Directives 9005-1, Sexual Misconduct Response. As such, the Committee found the grievor had not been aggrieved and recommended that the FA deny redress. 

Page details

2025-11-10

Quick Enquiry

We usually reply within a few hours
By submitting you agree to be contacted about your enquiry.
Call us Chat on WhatsApp
M

Migova AI Assistant

Online now
Hi 👋 I'm the Migova AI assistant, powered by OpenAI. Ask me about PR, study visas, work permits, LMIA, family sponsorship, provinces, or healthcare immigration to Canada.
Canada PR
Study Visa
LMIA / Work Permit