Home About Us Services ↳ Canada PR Visa (Permanent Residency) ↳ Work Permit Canada ↳ LMIA — Labour Market Impact Assessment ↳ Spouse & Family Sponsorship Visa ↳ Student Visa Canada ↳ Visitor Visa ↳ Business Visa Provinces ↳ 🏙️ Ontario ↳ 🏔️ British Columbia ↳ 🌾 Alberta ↳ 🌻 Saskatchewan ↳ 🌊 Manitoba ↳ ⚓ Nova Scotia ↳ 🍁 New Brunswick ↳ 🦞 Prince Edward Island ↳ 🐟 Newfoundland & Labrador ↳ 🌊 Atlantic Immigration Program Healthcare Blog FAQ Careers Canada Contact

# 2022-200 Careers, COVID-19

COVID-19

Case summary

F&R Date: 2024-04-18

The grievor contested the remedial measures (RM) issued and the administrative review (AR) conducted as a result of non-compliance with the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) COVID-19 vaccination policy. The grievor also grieved his release under item 5(f) Service Completed – Unsuitable for Further Service, of the table to article 15.01 of the Queen's Regulations and Orders for the Canadian Forces

There was no Initial Authority decision, given that the decision being grieved concerned a decision, act or omission of the Chief of the Defence Staff.

For the body of CAF COVID-19 vaccination policy related grievances, the Committee conducted an in-depth analysis of whether this policy infringed on the protected rights under section 7 the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the Charter), namely the right to liberty and security of the person. The Committee concluded that the CAF vaccination policy infringed on these rights and that their limitation was not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. This was because the Committee viewed the policy, in some respects, to be arbitrary and overly broad, and because its implementation was disproportionate. This led to a full analysis and conclusion that such limitations were not justified under section 1 of the Charter.

Additionally, the Committee found that the RM and the AR should not have occurred as the grievor was exercising a protected Charter right. A release for these reasons would have been unreasonable due to serious breaches of procedural fairness.

However, the Committee noted that separate RM were issued to the grievor for misconduct in contravention of the Defence Administrative Orders and Directives 7023-1, Defence Ethics Programme. These RM were also mentioned in the decision to release the grievor under item 5(f). While they were outside the scope of the grievance, the Committee found that there was evidence on the file that the grievor contravened the Defence Ethics Programme, which brought into question his suitability for further service. The Committee found that the decision to release the grievor was therefore justified and reasonable.

The Committee recommended that the Final Authority cancel the RM issued to the grievor pursuant to the CAF COVID-19 Vaccination Policy and remove all associated documents from the grievor's file.

Page details

2025-06-12

Quick Enquiry

We usually reply within a few hours
By submitting you agree to be contacted about your enquiry.
Call us Chat on WhatsApp
M

Migova AI Assistant

Online now
Hi 👋 I'm the Migova AI assistant, powered by OpenAI. Ask me about PR, study visas, work permits, LMIA, family sponsorship, provinces, or healthcare immigration to Canada.
Canada PR
Study Visa
LMIA / Work Permit