# 2018-090 Careers, Recorded Warning, Remedial Measures

Case summary

F&R Date: 2019-04-08

The grievor challenged a recorded warning (RW) he was issued and asked that it be removed from his file.

The Initial Authority found that the RW correctly reflected the grievor's performance during the monitoring period, following the initial counselling imposed for the same reason as the RW, and decided to retain the RW.

The Committee found that the grievor did not make satisfactory progress during the monitoring period and that it was reasonable to escalate the remedial measure and issue him a RW.

The Committee recommended not granting redress.

FA decision summary

The Comd of the Canadian Army, as Final Authority (FA), agreed with the Committee's recommendation to reject the grievance. The FA found that the grievor did not provide any justification to support his allegation that the RW was “unfounded in fact and in law” [Translation]. It also noted that the grievor had not disputed the content of an Initial Counselling and of his Personnel development review which mentioned performance deemed unsatisfactory. The FA found that the grievor had received good guidance for a long enough period for him to achieve the objectives. Noting certain improvements in the grievor's performance, the FA found that the approving authority was justified in issuing a RW since the grievor's performance remained unsatisfactory.