Survey Following a Special Examination—Chair of the Board of Directors of the Crown corporation
Name of organization:
Report date:
Chair of the Board of Directors
1. Value of the Examination
| Strongly disagree 1 |
Partially disagree 2 |
Neither agree, nor disagree 3 |
Partially agree 4 |
Strongly agree 5 |
No opinion/ Don’t know/ Not ApplicableN/A |
|
| 1.a The information provided by the auditors was valuable in performing our oversight responsibilities. | ||||||
| 1.b During discussions and in reports to the board members, the auditors identified valuable opportunities to strengthen systems and practices. | ||||||
| 1.c The recommendations focused on the most significant issues identified in the examination. |
2. Management of the Examination
| Strongly disagree 1 |
Partially disagree 2 |
Neither agree, nor disagree 3 |
Partially agree 4 |
Strongly agree 5 |
No opinion/ Don’t know/ Not ApplicableN/A |
|
| 2.a The examination covered key corporate management practices, operational activities and areas of significant risk within our organization. | ||||||
| 2.b The auditors’ questions and requests from the board members were relevant to the examination and represented reasonable expectations. |
3. Communications
| Strongly disagree 1 |
Partially disagree 2 |
Neither agree, nor disagree 3 |
Partially agree 4 |
Strongly agree 5 |
No opinion/ Don’t know/ Not ApplicableN/A |
|
| 3.a The auditors communicated with the board members appropriately, provided clear explanations and responses, and shared other comments in an open manner. | ||||||
| 3.b If there were exceptional issues, the auditors brought them to the attention of the appropriate board members and resolved them in a timely manner. | ||||||
| 3.c The auditors reported examination findings objectively and fairly. | ||||||
| 3.d The auditors prepared clear and concise reports. |
4. Professional Relations and Competencies
| Strongly disagree 1 |
Partially disagree 2 |
Neither agree, nor disagree 3 |
Partially agree 4 |
Strongly agree 5 |
No opinion/ Don’t know/ Not ApplicableN/A |
|
| 4.a The auditors collectively demonstrated sufficient understanding of the organization and its environment relevant to the examination. | ||||||
| 4.b The auditors collectively demonstrated sufficient technical competencies relevant to the examination. | ||||||
| 4.c The auditors conducted themselves professionally, including demonstrated independence, objectivity, non-partisanship, and professional skepticism (that is, maintained a respectful but questioning approach), throughout the examination. |
5. Overall
| Strongly disagree 1 |
Partially disagree 2 |
Neither agree, nor disagree 3 |
Partially agree 4 |
Strongly agree 5 |
No opinion/ Don’t know/ Not ApplicableN/A |
|
| 5.a Overall, we were satisfied with how the examination was conducted. |
6. Additional Comments
6.a Please provide any other comments you may have on your experience with the examination.
|
6.b Please provide suggestions on how we could bring more value to your organization.
|